Comments Posted By Ben Ragunton
Displaying 1 To 1 Of 1 Comments
DEMOCRATIC PARTY PARTISANS TO 'OUT' GAY REPUBLICANS
Talk about missing the boat... The whole idea is about outing hypocrisy. I don't have a problem with someone keeping their sexual activities private, but if it's discovered that a closeted gay politician voted AGAINST gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgendered issues simply because he wants to protect his little secret then you can guarantee that this little group of GLBT folk will be all over that like a pack of dogs on a three legged cat!!! It doesn't matter who the person is or what the party affiliation. If it's a Republican then they will be exposed for their hypocrisy. HOWEVER, if it's determined that the closeted politician is a Democrat, then watch out because he will be DEVOURED (metaphorically speaking of course) and his bones will be cast aside and crushed into dust!!! While we (Yes, I am gay) can be somewhat rutheless with a member of our community serving the Republican party and voting against self-interests, if we were ever to find someone like that among the Democrats (which would technically make him our ally) the response from us would be even worse!!!
Let's be fair and not go for spin. This whole article is painting a one-sided argument. We are only out to expose hypocritical behavior in politics, REGARDLESS of the party affiliation!!! Let me say that again. We are exposing HYPOCRISY, and it doesn't matter the political party.
"...but if it's discovered that a closeted gay politician voted AGAINST gay/lesbian/bisexual/transgendered issues..."
Yes - and those "issues" are determined by liberal gay activists for the most part. The belief that there is only one agenda for gays is arrogant - but effective propaganda.
And I call bullshit on exposing hypocrites in politics regardless of party. When you expose a Democrat for anything, come back and see me.
ed.
Comment Posted By Ben Ragunton On 25.04.2009 @ 01:17
